| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oral presentations - Abstracts Monday, March 24, 1997
KEYNOTE ADDRESS Populations of vegetarians living in
affluent countries appear to enjoy unusually good health, characterized
by low rates of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and total mortality.
This important observation has provided fuel for many lines of research
and has raised at least three general questions. Are these unusual health
statistics due to better nondietary lifestyle factors, such as low prevalence
of smoking and higher levels of physical activity? Are these statistics
due to low intake of harmful dietary factors, in particular meat? Are
these observations due to higher intake of beneficial dietary factors
that tend to replace meat in the diets? Due to the complex intercorrelations
of dietary factors and other lifestyle variables, these questions have
posed challenges to epidemiologists. However, there is now sufficient
evidence to indicate that the answers to all three questions are likely
to be "yes". Certainly, low smoking rates contribute importantly to
the low rates of coronary heart disease and many cancers, probably including
colon cancer, in the Seventh-day Adventist and other vegetarian populations.
Also, avoidance of red meat is likely to account in part for low rates
of coronary heart disease and colon cancer, but this does not appear
to be the primary reason for general good health in these populations.
Very generally, evidence accumulated in the past decade has emphasized
the importance of adequate consumption of beneficial dietary factors,
rather than just the avoidance of harmful factors. This includes abundant
intake of fruits and vegetables, the regular consumption of vegetable
oils including those in nuts, and the importance of consuming grains
in a minimally refined state. The notion that fat per se is a major
cause of ill health has not been supported by recent data. Many critical
questions will require additional research. Further knowledge about
the types of fruits and vegetables that are beneficial and their biologically
important constituents would make possible more specific advice and
more focused interventions. Also, observations that intakes of fish
and poultry seem to be beneficial for some health outcomes raises the
possibility that some of these foods also may contain components that
are not consumed in optimal amounts in some diets. Although current
knowledge already provides general guidance toward healthy diets, the
accumulated evidence strongly indicates a powerful, yet complex, impact
of diet on health and the need for further investigation.
The contribution of legumes to overall
dietary intake varies greatly among populations as legume intake differs
markedly throughout the world. Not surprisingly, those countries that
consume more plant-based diets also consume relatively more legumes.
In fact, other than the obvious distinction of not including flesh products,
the greater consumption of legumes by western vegetarians in comparison
to omnivores may be the most distinguishing feature of vegetarian diets.
Legumes are an excellent source of dietary fiber and on a caloric basis,
are generally no more than 10% fat (the main exceptions being soybeans
and peanuts) and between 20% and 30% protein. The glycemic index of
beans is extremely low which suggests legumes may be a particulary important
food for diabetics and for individuals who are at risk of becoming insulin
resistant. Also, the bacterial metabolism of the indigestible oligosaccharides
in legumes may produce beneficial health effects. Finally, legumes offer
a variety of potentially beneficial phytochemicals such as saponins
(found in a variety of legumes) and isoflavones (primarily found in
soybeans). Recent data suggest isoflavones may promote bone health,
and reduce risk of both cardiovascular disease and some forms of cancer.
There is growing evidence that cereals
and legumes play important roles in the prevention of chronic diseases.
Early epidemiologic studies of these associations focused on dietary
fiber rather than intake of grains or legumes. Generally, such studies
indicate an inverse association of dietary fiber and risk of coronary
disease; this observation has been replicated in recent cohort studies.
Studies focused on grain or cereal intake are fewer in number; they
tend to support an inverse association of whole grains with coronary
heart disease. The association of dietary fiber with colon and other
cancers have generally shown inverse associations; whether these are
attributable to cereal or to other fiber sources or other factors is
less clear. Although legumes have been demonstrated to lower blood cholesterol
levels, epidemiologic studies are few and inconclusive regarding the
association of legumes with risk of coronary heart disease. Legumes,
in particular soy, have been hypothesized to decrease risk of some cancers,
but epidemiologic studies are equivocal in this regard. Overall, there
is substantial epidemiologic evidence that dietary fiber and whole grain
intake is associated with decreased risk of coronary heart disease and
some cancers, while the role of legumes in these diseases is promising
but inconclusive.
Dietary guidance recommends consumption
of whole grains in the prevention of chronic diseases. Recent studies
find that whole grain consumption protects against cardiovascular disease,
cancer, and diabetes. Components in whole grains that may be protective
are diverse and include compounds that effect the gut environment, e.g.
dietary fiber, resistant starch, and oligosaccharides. Whole grains
are also rich in compounds that function as antioxidants such as trace
minerals and phenolic compounds, and compounds that are phytoestrogens
with potential hormonal effects. Whole grains also are rich sources
of compounds formerly thought of as antinutrients, for example phytic
acid. Phytic acid may function as an antioxidant in human foods and
therefore be protective, rather than detrimental to human health. Other
potential mechanistic effects of whole grains include binding of carcinogens
and modulation of glycemic index. Clearly the range of protective substances
in whole grains is impressive and advice to consume additional whole
grains is appropriate. Further study is needed on the mechanisms for
this protection so the most potent protective components of whole grains
are not lost in processing and preparation of whole grains into acceptable
foods for the public.
Ingestion of vegetable protein in place
of animal protein appears to be associated with the lower risk for coronary
heart disease. This effect may be related to changes in serum lipid
concentrations. The cholesterol lowering effects of soy protein as compared
with animal protein have been recognized in animal models for more than
80 years. These studies indicate that soy protein intake protects from
development of atherosclerosis. Our group recently completed a meta-analysis
of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids. We analyzed outcomes
reported by 29 controlled clinical studies. In most of these studies,
the intake of energy, fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol was similar
when the subjects ingested control and soy-containing diets. Soy protein
intake averaged 47 grams per day. Ingestion of soy protein was associated
with the following net changes in serum lipid concentrations from the
concentrations reached with the control diets: total cholesterol, a
decrease of 9.3 percent; LDL cholesterol, a decrease of 12.9 percent;
triglycerides, a decrease of 10.5 percent; and HDL a nonsignificant
increase of 2.4 percent.
There are a number of biologically plausible
reasons why consumption of vegetables and fruit might slow or prevent
the onset of chronic diseases. Vegetables and fruit are rich sources
of a variety of nutrients, including vitamins, trace minerals and dietary
fiber, and many classes of non-nutritive, biologically active compounds,
such as carotenoids, coumarins, the sulfur-containing dithiolthiones,
indoles, isothiocyanates and allyl sulfides, flavonoids, phenols, plant
sterols, isoflavones and lignans, and monoterpenes. These substances
have complementary and overlapping mechanisms of action, including the
induction of detoxification enzymes, stimulation of the immune system,
alteration of platelet aggregation, modulation of cholesterol synthesis
and hormone metabolism, dilution and binding of carcinogens in the intestinal
tract, and antibacterial, antiviral, and antioxidant effects. However,
no single compound acts through all proposed mechanisms and, even within
phytochemical classes, the biologic activity of compounds varies widely.
Consumption of vegetables and fruit contributes variety and complexity
to the diet. There is the potential for inhibitory, additive or synergistic
biologic interactions of compounds from within one plant food, as well
as interactions with other dietary components. Epidemiologic data support
the association between a high intake of vegetables and fruit and lowered
risk of chronic disease; the complexity of such a diet cannot be ignored
in the attempt to understand the mechanisms of action.
Perhaps one of the most unexpected and novel findings in nutritional epidemiology in the last 5 years has been that nut consumption protects against ischemic heart disease (IHD)--the leading cause of death for male and female adults world-wide. Frequency and quantity of nut consumption has been documented to be higher among vegetarian than in non-vegetarian populations. Nuts also constitute an important part of traditional plant-based diets, such as the Mediterranean and Asian Diets. In a prospective epidemiological study of approximately 31,000 California Adventists, we found that frequency of nut consumption had a substantial and highly significant inverse association with risk of myocardial infarction and death from IHD. The Iowa Women's Health Study has also documented an association between nut consumption and decreased risk of IHD. The protective effect of nuts on CHD
has been found in both men and women, adults, and the elderly, Caucasion
and African Americans. Importantly, nuts have similar associations in
both vegetarian and non-vegetarian Adventists. Finally, the protective
effect of nut consumption on IHD is not offset by an increased mortality
from other causes. Unpublished results from the California Adventist
Health Study indicates that frequency of nut consumption is inversely
related to all-cause mortality in African Americans and the elderly.
Thus, nut consumption may not only offer protection against IHD, but
also increase longevity.
Many studies have shown that reducing saturated fatty acids (SFA) elicits a marked total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering effect and, as a result, decreases risk of coronary heart disease. The pressing question to be resolved is what nutrient or nutrients should replace SFA calories in the diet? The present report reviews the existing literature that has examined the effects of high carbohydrate, low SFA diets and high fat diets (low SFA) that are high in unsaturated fatty acids with emphasis on studies that have used nuts to achieve nutrient targets. The nuts that have been studied principally have been almonds, which are a rich source of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and walnuts, which are high in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). To date, there have been only several studies conducted with nuts. They have been designed to evaluate the effects of nuts on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in diets that are both high and relatively low in total fat. Collectively the studies that have compared the plasma lipid/lipoprotein responses of a high carbohydrate diet low in SFA to a high fat, high MUFA diet low in SFA (using nuts) have reported similar total and LDL-cholesterol lowering effects. In addition, the high MUFA diet either increased or maintained HDL-cholesterol levels in contrast to the high carbohydrate diet in which a typical HDL-cholesterol lowering effect was observed. There also is evidence to show beneficial plasma lipid/lipoprotein effects of a Step-One diet relatively high in PUFA provided by walnuts. In this study the high walnut diet resulted in even greater reductions in total and LDL-cholesterol levels than did the typical Step-One diet, and the ratio of LDL-cholesterol to HDL cholesterol decreased. Additional studies are needed to corroborate
these findings and to resolve the question of whether there are other
biologically active molecules in nuts that promote lipid lowering or
confer other beneficial health effects. In this regard, we need to know
whether there are distinctive biological effects observed for the different
nuts and importantly, what constituents in nuts account for these responses.
It is estimated that dietary and lifestyle modification could halve the rate of CHD. However, the current dietary guidelines of the AHA (30% fat, 200-300 mg dietary cholesterol) may not be sufficient to stop the progression of coronary heart disease. Hunninghake demonstrated only a 5% improvement in LDL cholesterol from a step 2 AHA diet compared to 27% improvement from lovastatin in the same patients. Patients randomly assigned to the control group in a number of regression trials were consuming a step 1 or step 2 diet, yet the majority of these patients continued to show progression of disease. However, regression of coronary atherosclerosis may occur when dietary intake of fat and cholesterol are much lower. Dietary intake of fat and cholesterol
may have short-term as well as long-term effects, for better and for
worse. Even a single high-fat, high cholesterol meal may cause acute
enhancement of platelet reactivity as well as sludging in arterial beds.
These changes may result from a shift in the thromboxane/prostacyclin
balance to favor thromboxane production. In animals with atherosclerosis
induced by high-cholesterol diets, platelets synthesize thromboxane
A2 in increased amounts. Since cholesterol is contained only in foods
of animal origin, a vegetarian diet may shift the balance away from
thromboxane formation, which would make both coronary spasm and platelet
aggregation less likely to occur.
We face an obsession in the U.S. that low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets are essential for health, driven largely by an effort to reduce heart disease and more recently certain types of cancer. The "fat phobia" line of reasoning is much clearer for heart disease than it is for cancer. We have learned over the past several years that all fats are not alike, and specifically that saturated fatty acids are more closely associated with risk factors for heart disease. The other broad classifications of dietary fats, polyunsaturated and monounsaturated, do not have as strong an associated risk. An examination of fat-containing foods leads to the conclusion that unsaturated fatty acids are largely found in plant-based foods, and saturated fatty acids in animal foods. In general, plant foods are thought to be rich in carbohydrates, low in fats and low in protein. However, populations that meet all of their nutrition needs from plants, consume plant-based foods that are rich in fat, i.e. nuts, seeds, and oils from plants and seeds, and rich in protein, ie mature beans, peas, and other legumes. Fat is an essential nutrient and, in the body, for example, becomes an important component of cell membranes in the formation of prostaglandins and leukotrienes. The human body can synthesize fat from carbohydrate. Scientists are now beginning to appreciate a relationship between the amount and type of dietary fats to the types of fats found in body fat depots. [Vegetarian Congress contents]
University
| Medical_Center
| LLU&MC_home
|
Search
| Employment |
News_&_events
| Academics
| Our_mission |
Admissions |
Registration |
Research |
Alumni |
Student_resources
All contents copyright © 2001 Loma
Linda University. All rights reserved. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||