Request Email Alerts
Search Funding Databases
Comprehensive source of all federal funding: Grants.gov
State & Local County Sponsors
LLU Funding Sources
Fellowships & Training
Grants & Funding Resources
Are You Eligible for Funding Opportunity?
Single, on-line source for all U.S. federal grants
Funds for training in the biological sciences and undergraduate science education
SMARTS at LLU (LLeRA login is required)
Single on-line source for all U.S. federal grants
Sponsored Program Information Network (SPIN) (LLeRA login is required)
Health Research Funding (Opening a New Door for Unfunded Research Projects)
Funding opportunities for promising biomedical research that was peer-reviewed but did not receive funding. Developed by the National Health Council in conjunction with NIH.
Funding opportunities for Behavioral & Social Sciences
Funding opportunities for Public Health
Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) programs help researchers find funding opportunities and develop their research into marketable businesses.
FedConnect.net is a one-stop location for finding federal contract and grant opportunities. Federal agencies currently subscribed to FedConnect.net include the Department of Energy, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of the Interior, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
Proposal Central is an e-grant-making website shared by many government, non-profit, and private grant-making organizations. Organizations associated with the site include the American Cancer Society, California Breast Cancer Research Program, and the Alzheimer's Association.
Includes information on biomedical grants and fellowships for graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, junior faculty, and undergraduates.
Note: This section contains a list of the most popular federal sponsors used by LLU researchers to obtain funding. To search for all federal grant opportunities, go to Grants.gov, the single on-line source for finding all federal grant opportunities.
National Institutes of Health
- Main page for Office of Extramural Research
- NIH news flashes
- All about Grants podcasts
- Collaboration and Team Science: A Field Guide (guidance for building collaborative research teams)
- Types of Grant Programs (R01, R03, R21, etc)
- Small Business Innovation Research Opportunities (SBIR)
- NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts
- Center for Scientific Review (CSR)
- Individual NIH Centers Institutes, and Divisions
- Training Opportunities
- Employee Directory
NIH Forms & Guidelines
Note: All LLU researchers will apply to NIH using the LLeRA electronic proposal submission process outlined in the LLeRA Proposal Development Manual, and the forms will be automatically provided.
- To find electronic submission forms, log in to LLeRA (Request LLeRA password)
- NIH forms and deadlines (for guidance purposes only -- LLU researchers will use the submission process outlined in the LLeRA Proposal Development Manual)
- Guidance on the New NIH Proposal Format
- New NIH Proposal Format and Review Process--Video and PPT: What Applicants Need to Know
- Restructured NIH Applications: One Year Later (Powerpoint presentation by B.L. Taylor on 2/9/11)
- Sample RO1 Applications and Summary Statements (from the NIAID website)
- eRA Commons – https://commons.era.nih.gov/commons/
- Application Basics – http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants/grant_basics.htm
- Process Overview – http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants/grants_process.htm
- Grant Writing Tips – http://grants.nih.gov/grants/grant_tips.htm
- Receipt Dates/Deadlines – http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/submissionschedule.htm
- Training Contacts – http://grants.nih.gov/training/tac_training_contacts.doc
National Science Foundation
NSF Forms & Guidelines
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Information regarding current funding opportunities (including grants, cooperative agreements, fellowships, etc.) can be found in the NASA Solicitation and Proposal Integrated Review and Evaluation System (NSPIRES). This web-based system supports the entire life cycle of NASA research solicitations and awards; from the release of announcements, through the peer review and selection process, to awards management.
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)
The CDC provides funding to health-related and research organizations for health information dissemination, preparedness, prevention, research, and surveillance.
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
USAID provides funding for global health and humanitarian assistance in Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Near East, Latin America and the Caribbean, Europe and Eurasia. The USAID Center for Faith-based and Community Initiatives (CFBCI) assists faith and community-based organizations by providing information on funding and partnership opportunities with government as well as other faith and community-based groups.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)
The Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP) of DOD supports research on breast, prostate, ovarian and lung cancer, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, autism, etc. Grant applications are solicited once a year.
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is the central research and development office for the DOD.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
The Life and Medical Sciences Division of the DOE funds a diverse portfolio of research to develop fundamental biological information and to advance technology in support of DOE's missions in biology, medicine, and the environment. Major research areas include genomics research, health sciences research related to radiation and imaging techniques, and scientific user facilities.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS)
The DHHS (also referred to as HHS) is the parent organization of the NIH, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC), the Agency for Health care Research and Quality (AHRQ), and the Health Resources and Services Administration, among others.
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
The DOJ funds research and programs related to the criminal justice system, including substance abuse and victims of crime.
U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (VA)
State of California
Submit the proposal through Research Administration if:
- There is an announced deadline for the proposal, and
- There is no limit* on number of submissions per institution.
- American Cancer Society
- American Diabetes Association
- American Heart Association
- American Heart Association (Western Affiliate)
- American Institute for Cancer Research
- Association of Schools of Public Health
- CDC Foundation
- Health Effects Institute
- Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International
- Nancy R. Gelman Foundation (for breast cancer)
- Susan G. Koman Foundation (for breast cancer)
The purpose of the GRASP awards, an intramural award offered through the LLU Office of the Vice President for Research Affairs, is:
- to promote inter-school collaboration in research;
- encourage faculty to become more involved in research; and
- to develop grant preparation skills and general preliminary data for subsequent, extramural peer-reviewed proposals.
More information about eligibility and criteria for evaluation can be found at LLU's GRASP page.
DOES YOUR SCHOOL, DEPARTMENT OR CENTER OFFER RESEARCH FUNDING?
Please submit information regarding your funding opportunities to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Grantsnet: Includes information on biomedical grants and fellowships for graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, junior faculty, and undergraduates.
The National Academies Fellowships Office: Administers predoctoral, dissertation, and postdoctoral fellowship programs.
Grants & Funding Information Service: An information service provided by the University of Washington. While some of the information provided is for UW researchers only, many non-UW related funding sources are also listed by subject area.
The Grantsmanship Center, in partnership with the Annenburg Foundation and the California Community Foundation, is an extensive resource of grants information and grantsmanship training.
Do you have a resource that you would like to see listed here? Submit information about grant funding resources to email@example.com.
Adapted from Arizona State University's Investigator Handbook. Used with permission.
Check the announcement to see if the sponsor limits the number of proposals that can be submitted from an institution. If it does, the proposal must be submitted via LLU's Limited Submissions process.
- Any officer of the institution or any person holding a full-time faculty appointment at the level of Assistant Professor or above in any school of the institution may serve as a PI.
- An employee who does not have a faculty appointment may collaborate with an experienced investigator who agrees to oversee the study as the PI.
- Employees may apply to the Vice President for Research Affairs (VPRA) to be authorized to serve as PI. After reviewing the application, the VPRA will recommend an action to the Research Oversight Committee, which will make the final decision.
A faculty member who is a candidate for a degree may not be the PI of record for IRB, IACUC, or grant applications that pertain to the degree.
The PI acts in the name of the institution in directing a research program. The PI will work under the oversight of the institutional officers and with the approval of the VPRA. Loma Linda University expects that the PI will:
- Be responsible for directing and identifying the resources necessary to complete the project;
- Have a working knowledge of applicable institutional and governmental policies and regulations;
- Be solely responsible for the ethical and professional conduct of the research and safety of the research personnel as defined in the University's administrative handbook.
Restrictions on the PI
Review the announcement for restrictions on the PI. Many sponsors restrict PIs by:
- U.S. Citizenship
- The PI's field of expertise
- Number of years since receipt of PhD
Restrictions on the Institution
Review the announcement for restrictions on the institution (see guidance if sponsor limits the number of proposals to be considered from one institution).
The PI is eligible if the sponsor requires LLU to be:
- An institution of higher education (IHE)
- A non-profit organization
- A 501(c)(3) entity
The PI is not eligible if the sponsor requires LLU to be:
- A land-grant school
- A minority serving institution
- A small business entity
- A local education agency (LEA)
The purpose of determining feasibility is to identify potential risks or problems and to ensure that the project can be properly carried out and managed. Most importantly, the feasibility of a project can aid in the decision-making process and minimize financial strains on the department and institution.
A good feasibility analysis can indicate whether a sponsored project is likely to get the institution's approval or disapproval.
Research Affairs - Financial Management has developed a Feasibility Checklist that should be used as soon as an investigator is considering submitting a proposal. This checklist is an excellent start in deciding whether the PI's current resources and time will support the project plan.
Mission and Policy of the Institution
- The underlying principles of the project are within Loma Linda University's mission and values
- The approach used in the program is in compliance with the institution's policies and procedures
- The investigator is eligible to serve as Principle Investigator (PI) according to institutional policy
- There is sufficient time to prepare the proposal package, get all required approvals, and submit the proposal. See Recommended Time line.
- If other institutions/organizations are involved as part of a consortium agreement or as sub-award recipients, there is sufficient time to get documentation of their involvement.
Responsible Conduct of Research
- There is sufficient time to address regulatory compliance issues regarding human subjects, animal care and use, radioactive materials, bio-hazardous materials (including "select agents"), export controls, research conflict of interest and human stem cell research
- There is sufficient time to fulfill any federally mandated education requirements related to the above issues
- Training is available when described as necessary
- Personnel, materials, facilities, and research space are available when described as necessary
- Administrative support personnel are available
Affordable for the Department (possible sharing of costs)
- The following costs are affordable, considering sponsor budget guidelines and the department's operating budget:
- The total costs of program materials
- The total costs of training
- The training time and effort commitment of new or existing personnel
- Administrative support personnel
- If cost sharing or matching funds is required, the department has sufficient funds to fulfill cost sharing commitments
Facilities and Administration (F&A) Rate
- The sponsor provides F&A (at what rate?)
- If F&A is restricted additional steps may be required to cover costs
Budget and Project Plan
- Examine other project costs for all activities usually performed
- Overlap between projects is reasonable
- Rate of planned progress is reasonable based on prior projects
- Summary totals agree with detailed breakdowns
- Dates, milestones, and timeframes are consistent
- Allocated effort matches the anticipated workload
- Allocated effort matches the costs in the budget
- PI is too inexperienced in the proposed area of research or research methods
- PI is ineligible according to sponsor's requirements or LLU's requirements
- PI and other key personnel have too few publications to establish credibility in the field
- Key people cannot participate in the study
- Key persons (in a multidisciplinary project) cannot agree on objectives
- Internal staff experience and training is insufficient for the project
Research Plan / Methodology Issues
- Overambitious research plan with an unrealistically large amount of work
- Project lacks enough preliminary data
- Issue is scientifically premature
- Risks (probability of adverse consequences) are too high
- Cost/benefit or risk/reward ratio isn't favorable enough
- Requirements are unclear, or keep changing radically
- Methods are unsuited to the objective
- Proposed model system is not appropriate to address the proposed question
- Experiments are too dependent on the success of initial proposed experiment. Lack of alternative methods in case the primary approach does not succeed.
- Problem is more complex than the PI appears to realize